Home > Off-Broadway Reviews >Our Town Review

OFF-BROADWAY REVIEW

Our Town Review Off-BroadwayOUR TOWN OFF-BROADWAY REVIEW
Reviewed by Sasha Pensanti
Published 2010-02-11

We trekked through the snow this evening in what is now affectionately being called "Snowpocalypse 2010" to see the off-Broadway production of Thorton Wilder's "Our Town" at the Barrow Street Theatre. Having to make the journey through the snow from midtown all the way down to the village seemed like a daunting task, but my limited knowledge of the play had me eager nonetheless. As we started out, I found myself slightly concerned. I knew nothing of the play, but yet had heard about it so many times, and I wondered then, would I be disappointed if it wasn't as good as it had been built up to be? I would later find out any such fear was highly unfounded.  As we took our seats, on the stage itself, I glanced at my playbill and noticed that the first member of the cast (listed in order of appearance) was Stage Manger. I found this odd, but brushed it off to the assumption that said person would come out and make a speech about turning off all cell phones and other electronic devises that would not have had a role in this turn-of-the-PREVIOUS-century play.


Wrong. Stephen Kunken took his spot at the center of the stage, which consisted of two simple table and four chairs sets. He held up a flip-cell phone and snapped it shut. He began with a thorough description of Grover's Corners New Hampshire, which he let us know is "Our Town." This is turn of the century, small town America. Early 1900s. Most occupants of this small town were born in the latter half of the 1800s, and everyone knows everyone else’s business. The church is off to the right of me, well, all five churches (except for the Baptists, they’re down by the river). The school is by the entrance; two homes right in front, very important homes. His speech became more detailed as he stared off into the distance and waited for you to join him, allowing your mind to exercise all imaginative abilities and see exactly what he saw. As he invited the two families' mothers out onto the stage to begin making their invisible breakfast, you get the feeling he isn't going anywhere. But that's okay! Stephen is as engaging as anyone can hope a narrator to be, which is now what we see he is.


I find myself laughing more than I originally anticipated. Aren’t most “classic” plays dramatic? Aren’t all of the shows that kids do in high school more sad than funny, or at least choked full of “morals”? Not this one. We may think that their life was boring, but it was all they had. The show gives snap shots of life, little vignettes, not necessarily in chronological order.  The set is nothing to speak of, but there were times when certain choices felt awkward and out of place, such as the placing of a single chair on the table top to indicate the upstairs bedroom of George Gibbs or Emily Webb. While it wasn’t something I understood immediately, I had the distinct feeling that the director, David Cromer, wanted it to be awkward. He wanted it to feel out of place and different than it should, so I let it slide.


A few of the actors looked familiar, but when I checked them in the playbill, none had ever been in anything I’d seen before. But that was part of their charm, that everyone felt like they could be that Any man that you recognize. That person who feels like the neighbor you’ve known all your life, and for some strange reason that was comforting, even though I knew it was far from the truth. There were, of course, inconsequential characters, but as they say, there are no small parts, just small actors. Everyone made the best of the roles they were cast in, and those who were given larger roles (even the many understudies we saw) proved to be engaging and believable.


The only thing I found problematic and disturbing throughout the first two acts was the costuming. I can get past black box staging. I can get past the lack of scenery and even black box costuming with everyone in the same pit-colored clothing. In this adaptation of “Our Town” they chose to give the characters slightly modernized clothing. Everything was toned down, muted colors and, often, paisley prints to be reminiscent of a time gone by. However, the girls wore pants! I couldn’t believe that these post-Victorian women would be allowed to do such. Every picture I had seen of previous productions showed the women in full get ups. It wasn’t until the third act that it all came together.


Just when I thought I’d seen it all. I’d seen all the well-thought-out changes to classic theatre pieces there was to see, I found myself biting my tongue. I was wrong. David Cromer’s adaptation of “Our Town” is brilliant. I won’t give it away, but the shift at the climax of the third act will blow your mind. Suddenly the whole play makes sense. This isn’t just a funny string of out-of-order moments. This isn’t just the days, weeks, or minutes in the life of some small-town folk that we can’t hope to understand. This is a universal story of life, love, death and understanding it all.


Thorton Wilder left us a fantastic piece of theatre that deserves to be revived time and time again. It deserves all the accolades it gets, and deserves to be put on by high school after high school. It even deserves the spot it had on the old TV series “Growing Pains” (which was where I first heard of it as a kid). But truly, it is David Cromer and the current cast of “Our Town” who really bring it to life. Everything in this production is exactly as it should be. Don’t walk, RUN to see this show. As an avid lover of musicals, I can wholeheartedly say this play stole my heart.



Click here to buy group tickets.

Sign Up

     

 FEATURED SHOWS: